SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
89 Overall Score
vs
Samsung PM9A1 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung PM9A1 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Samsung
60 Overall Score

Scores

Console
SanDisk
85
Samsung
62
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Samsung
58
Gaming
SanDisk
84
Samsung
64
Laptop
SanDisk
65
Samsung
66
Budget
SanDisk
57
Samsung
61
Portable
SanDisk
23
Samsung
17

Specifications

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Samsung PM9A1
Drive
Capacity
8,000
2,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
7,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
5,200
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
1,000,000
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
850,000
Hardware
NANDTLC★—
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
No data
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
No data
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓✓

Pros & Cons

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Samsung PM9A1 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong speed (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong capacity (79th percentile)
  • Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average affordability (23rd percentile)
  • Below average feature (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 89 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Better at:

GamingConsolePortableWorkstation

Samsung PM9A1 Better at:

Budget