Kingston KVR16N11H/8
Kingston
34 Overall Score
vs
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
Crucial
69 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
Specifications
| Kingston KVR16N11H/8 | Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3 | DDR4★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 240 | 288 |
| Rank | — | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 11★ | 22 |
| Timings | — | 22-22-22 |
| Voltage | 1.5 | 1.2000000476837158★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Kingston KVR16N11H/8
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
Pricing
Kingston KVR16N11H/80.472score per dollar
vs
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A0.112score per dollar
Kingston KVR16N11H/8 offers 4.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
Scores 69 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.
