ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27" Negro 2026
ASUS
88 Overall Score
vs
Pixio Wave PXC248WAVE 24" White 2025
Pixio
70 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Office
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27" | Pixio Wave PXC248WAVE 24" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 24" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | IPS★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,500 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 210 Hz★ | 200 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.30000001192092896 ms★ | 1 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium★ | Adaptive-Sync |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 400 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 95% DCI-P3 | 108.86% sRGB / 85.72% DCI-P3 / 80.65% NTSC |
| Color Depth | 1.073 Billion | 16.7 Million |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | HDR |
| HDR Support | HDR400 | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1★ | — |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 75x75 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Power | — | 24W★ |
| Weight | 6.89 kg | 2.85 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27" Negro 2026
- Strong performance (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong color (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong connectivity (90th percentile)90th %ile
Pixio Wave PXC248WAVE 24" White 2025
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong performance (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong color (76th percentile)
- Below average display (33rd percentile)
Pricing
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27" Negro 20260.216score per dollar
vs
Pixio Wave PXC248WAVE 24" White 20250.582score per dollar
Pixio Wave PXC248WAVE 24" White 2025 offers 2.7x better value for money
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27" Negro 2026
Pixio Wave PXC248WAVE 24" White 2025
Verdict
Winner: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27"
Scores 88 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 27 specs.
