Acer PM Series PM161Q 15.6" Black
Acer
42 Overall Score
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27" Negro 2026
ASUS
88 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portable
Office
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Specifications
| Acer PM Series PM161Q 15.6" | ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 15.6" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 210 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 4 ms | 0.30000001192092896 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync Premium★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 400 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 16.7 Million Colors (6-Bit+FRC) | 95% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 6-Bit+FRC | 1.073 Billion |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 2★ | 1 |
| Speakers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 75mm x 75mm | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Power | 25W★ | — |
| Weight | 1.10 kg★ | 6.89 kg |
Pros & Cons
Acer PM Series PM161Q 15.6" Black
- Strong portability (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average color (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average display (22nd percentile)
- Below average feature (25th percentile)
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27" Negro 2026
- Strong performance (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong color (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong connectivity (90th percentile)90th %ile
Pricing
Acer PM Series PM161Q 15.6" Black0.262score per dollar
vs
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27" Negro 20260.216score per dollar
Acer PM Series PM161Q 15.6" Black offers 1.2x better value for money
Acer PM Series PM161Q 15.6" Black
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27" Negro 2026
Verdict
Winner: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQL5A 27"
Scores 88 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 28 specs.
