MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025
MSI
91 Overall Score
vs
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" Black 2025
ASUS
87 Overall Score
Scores
Gaming
Creative
Professional
Office
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" | ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | OLED | OLED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ | FreeSync Premium Pro |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3 | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 10-bit | 10-bit |
| HDR | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | HDR10 |
| HDR Support | HDR400 | HDR10★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Power | — | 42W★ |
| Weight | 8.10 kg★ | 8.80 kg |
Pros & Cons
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" Black 2025
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
Pricing
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 20250.111score per dollar
vs
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" Black 20250.065score per dollar
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025 offers 1.7x better value for money
MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM 32" Black 2025
Verdict
Winner: MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27"
Scores 91 overall, wins 1 of 6 usage categories and 4 of 28 specs.
