MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED 49" Metallic Black 2024

MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED 49" Metallic Black 2024

MSI
88 Overall Score
vs
LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B 32" Black 2025

LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B 32" Black 2025

LG
93 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED 49" Metallic Black 2024

78 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

The MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED monitor delivers stunning picture quality with vibrant colors and deep blacks, making it a top choice for gaming and productivity. However, some users have reported defects like bad pixels or screen flickering after a few months, and MSI's customer service has been criticized for sending refurbished units as replacements. The SDR mode out of the box is poorly calibrated, but HDR mode works excellently. Overall, it's a high-end monitor with potential reliability issues.

Pros
  • Stunning QD-OLED picture quality
  • Vibrant colors and deep blacks
  • Excellent HDR performance
  • Immersive 32:9 ultrawide aspect ratio
  • Great for gaming and productivity
Cons
  • Poor SDR calibration out of the box
  • Defects like bad pixels or flickering after months
  • Expensive shipping for warranty repairs
  • Refurbished units sent as replacements
  • Cable management could be better
👍 Picture quality 7
👍 Hdr performance 3
👎 Sdr calibration 2
👎 Reliability defects 2
👎 Customer service 1
👎 Cable management 1

LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B 32" Black 2025

85 out of 100 medium confidence 27 reviews

This LG UltraGear 32" OLED monitor is highly praised for console gaming, especially with its glossy 4K display and 120Hz+ refresh rate. Users love the picture quality and HDR performance, though some note minor annoyances like the headphone jack placement and auto-input switching quirks. A few reported a smudge on the screen out of the box, but it was easily cleaned.

Pros
  • Glossy 4K OLED display
  • Great for console gaming at 120Hz
  • Excellent HDR performance
  • Good value under $800
  • Sleek design without gamer aesthetic
Cons
  • Headphone jack on bottom of monitor
  • Auto-input switching can be intrusive
  • Screen smudge reported out of box
  • No USB-C port
  • No integrated speakers
👍 Display quality 5
👍 Gaming performance 4
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Design aesthetics 2
👎 Headphone jack placement 1
👎 Auto input switching 1

Scores

Gaming
MSI
97
LG
87
Office
MSI
96
LG
89
Entertainment
MSI
88
LG
77
Professional
MSI
81
LG
85
Creative
MSI
78
LG
82
Portable
MSI
13
LG
14

Specifications

MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED 49"LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B 32"
Display
Size49"32"
Resolution5120 x 14403840 x 2160
Panel TypeQD-OLEDOLED
Aspect Ratio32:916:9
Curved✓✗
Curvature1,800—
Screen Finishmatte—
Performance
Refresh Rate144 Hz165 Hz★
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms0.029999999329447746 ms
Adaptive SyncAdaptive-SyncFreeSync Premium Pro★
Color & HDR
Brightness250 nits275 nits★
Color Gamut98% Adobe RGB, 99% DCI-P3, 146% sRGBDCI-P3 98.5% (CIE1976)
Color Depth10-bit10-bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400DisplayHDR True Black 400
HDR SupportHDR400HDR400
Connectivity
HDMI Ports22
DisplayPort11
USB-C13★
Speakers✗✗
Headphone Jack✓✓
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable✓✓
Tilt✓✓
Swivel✓✓
Pivot✓✓
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam✗✗
Touchscreen✗✗
PIP/PBP✓★✗
Weight10.30 kg9.12 kg★

Pros & Cons

MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED 49" Metallic Black 2024

  • Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong performance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile

LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B 32" Black 2025

  • Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong performance (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile

Pricing

MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED 49" Metallic Black 2024

LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B 32" Black 2025

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B 32"

Scores 93 overall, wins 2 of 6 usage categories and 5 of 29 specs.

MSI MPG 491CQP QD-OLED 49" Better at:

GamingOfficeEntertainment

LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B 32" Better at:

CreativeProfessional

Also Consider