Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Tamron
100 Overall Score
vs
Sirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm

Sirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm

Sirui
70 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

92 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Tamron 28-300mm super-zoom wins praise for its lightweight design, versatile focal range, and solid image quality. Users appreciate the compact build and smooth zoom mechanism, but note the slow aperture and trade-offs in sharpness compared to more expensive zooms. Verified reviewers find it an ideal travel lens that pairs well with Sony bodies.

Pros
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile 28-300mm focal range
  • Smooth zoom ring operation
  • Compact build for travel
  • Good integration with Sony bodies
Cons
  • Small maximum aperture (f/4-7.1)
  • Reduced sharpness vs. premium zooms
  • Not an internal zoom lens
  • Slow autofocus at high fps on some bodies
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Sharpness 3
👎 Aperture 2
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Zoom range 4
👎 Autofocus performance 1

Sirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm

45 out of 100 low confidence 6 reviews

The Sirui Aurora 35mm f/1.4 lens receives mixed reviews. Some users praise its value for money, compact size, and smooth autofocus, while others report severe sharpness issues and poor corner performance. A verified buyer called it the worst lens they've ever seen, but another verified buyer says it's an amazing deal compared to the Sony GM. The Q&A confirms a 62mm filter thread.

Pros
  • Great value for money
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Smooth autofocus for video
  • Beautiful bokeh at f/1.4
  • Good build quality
Cons
  • Inconsistent sharpness across copies
  • Poor corner performance
  • Chromatic aberration present
  • Autofocus not as snappy as Sony GM
  • Some users report terrible image quality
🤔 Sharpness 4
👍 Value for money 3
🤔 Autofocus performance 3
👍 Build quality 2
👍 Bokeh 2
👎 Corner performance 2

Scores

Macro
Tamron
91
Sirui
90
Budget
Tamron
91
Sirui
61
Landscape
Tamron
90
Sirui
71
Portrait
Tamron
87
Sirui
87
Professional
Tamron
85
Sirui
83
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
84
Sirui
63
Travel
Tamron
84
Sirui
57
Street
Tamron
82
Sirui
75
Video Cinema
Tamron
80
Sirui
79

Specifications

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mmSirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm35 mm
Elements2016
Groups1311
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements2★1
Coatingfluorine coatingProtective Fluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/1.4
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades915★
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.59 kg0.49 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD linear motor★step motor
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm35 mm★
Max Magnification1:2.81:7.14

Pros & Cons

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile

Sirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Sirui Aurora 35mm F1.4 35mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm

Scores 100 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD 300mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelLandscapeWildlife Sports

Also Consider