Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Canon
64 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
80 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
78 out of 100 high confidence 459 reviews
The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and robust build quality. Many users consider it a workhorse for sports, portraits, and low-light photography, though the lack of image stabilization is a notable drawback for some. A significant number of reviews highlight the lens's weight and the potential for focus inconsistencies, particularly with moving subjects. Concerns about Canon's support for older models and the tripod collar design also appear in negative feedback.
Pros
- Exceptional sharpness and image quality
- Fast and silent autofocus (USM)
- Excellent for low-light photography
- Versatile for sports and portraits
- Robust build quality
Cons
- No image stabilization
- Heavy and bulky
- Tripod collar design issues
- Inconsistent autofocus with moving subjects
- Canon no longer supports repairs
Image quality 35
Autofocus performance 28
Build quality 22
Weight and size 18
Image stabilization 15
Value for money 12
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Landscape
Travel
Macro
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Professional
Street
Portrait
Specifications
| Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 70 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 300 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 20 |
| Groups | 13 | 14 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 5 | 5 |
| Coating | Air Sphere Coating | water- and oil-repellent coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | 22-45★ |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 3.5-6.7 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.07 kg | 0.61 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | USM★ | HLA |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops | 6 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 700 mm | 170 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.3x | 1:2★ |
Pros & Cons
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
- Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
- Below average macro (33rd percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong macro (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
- Below average bokeh (25th percentile)
Pricing
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM0.043score per dollar
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.133score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offers 3.1x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.
