Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Canon
64 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 105mm f/1.4E ED 105mm

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 105mm f/1.4E ED 105mm

Nikon
50 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

78 out of 100 high confidence 459 reviews

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and robust build quality. Many users consider it a workhorse for sports, portraits, and low-light photography, though the lack of image stabilization is a notable drawback for some. A significant number of reviews highlight the lens's weight and the potential for focus inconsistencies, particularly with moving subjects. Concerns about Canon's support for older models and the tripod collar design also appear in negative feedback.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness and image quality
  • Fast and silent autofocus (USM)
  • Excellent for low-light photography
  • Versatile for sports and portraits
  • Robust build quality
Cons
  • No image stabilization
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Tripod collar design issues
  • Inconsistent autofocus with moving subjects
  • Canon no longer supports repairs
👍 Image quality 35
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Build quality 22
👎 Weight and size 18
👎 Image stabilization 15
👍 Value for money 12

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 105mm f/1.4E ED 105mm

85 out of 100 high confidence 83 reviews

The Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED is widely praised as one of the best portrait lenses available, delivering stunning sharpness, creamy bokeh, and beautiful color rendition even wide open. Many users consider it a significant upgrade over the 85mm f/1.4 and 70-200mm f/2.8, though they note it is large, heavy, and expensive. A few reviewers report autofocus speed issues, front-focus problems, or softness at minimum focus distance, but the overwhelming majority find the optical performance magical and worth the investment.

Pros
  • Stunning sharpness wide open
  • Creamy bokeh and background separation
  • Beautiful color rendition and contrast
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Solid build quality with weather sealing
Cons
  • Very expensive
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Autofocus can be slow in some situations
  • Front-focus issues reported on some copies
  • Softness at minimum focus distance wide open
👍 Image quality 55
👍 Bokeh 30
🤔 Autofocus performance 15
👍 Build quality 20
🤔 Value for money 18
👎 Weight and size 22

Scores

Landscape
Canon
87
Nikon
38
Wildlife Sports
Canon
76
Nikon
33
Video Cinema
Canon
74
Nikon
47
Budget
Canon
71
Nikon
48
Travel
Canon
69
Nikon
29
Professional
Canon
69
Nikon
45
Macro
Canon
59
Nikon
48
Street
Canon
56
Nikon
45
Portrait
Canon
49
Nikon
50

Specifications

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USMNikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 105mm f/1.4E ED 105mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min70 mm105 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm105 mm
Elements1714
Groups139
Aspherical Elements2★0
ED Elements5★3
CoatingAir Sphere CoatingNano Crystal Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountCanon EFNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight1.07 kg0.98 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★Autofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance700 mm★1.00 m
Max Magnification0.3x1:7.7★

Pros & Cons

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

  • Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 105mm f/1.4E ED 105mm

  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (76th percentile)
  • Strong user sentiment (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Pricing

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM is £253 cheaper (1.2x less).

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM0.043score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 105mm f/1.4E ED 105mm0.029score per dollar

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM offers 1.5x better value for money

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 105mm f/1.4E ED 105mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Scores 64 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider