Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

Fujifilm
79 Overall Score
vs
Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm

Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm

Sony
49 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Fujifilm
80
Sony
48
Macro
Fujifilm
78
Sony
27
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
75
Sony
52
Street
Fujifilm
70
Sony
61
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
70
Sony
41
Budget
Fujifilm
68
Sony
47
Landscape
Fujifilm
64
Sony
28
Portrait
Fujifilm
60
Sony
62
Travel
Fujifilm
60
Sony
41

Specifications

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mmSony E SEL16F28S 16mm
Optics
Typeprimewide-angle
Focal Length Min18 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm16 mm
Elements155
Groups95
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper EBC coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.37 kg0.07 kg
Filter Thread62 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motorAuto Focus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm240 mm
Max Magnification1:6.670.078x

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

Scores 79 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm Better at:

Portrait