Desiontal 420-800mm

Desiontal 420-800mm

Desiontal
37 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron
99 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Desiontal 420-800mm

72 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

This 420-800mm manual telephoto zoom lens receives mixed feedback. Many users praise its value for astrophotography and long-distance shots, noting good build quality and lightweight design. However, some report issues with color accuracy at long range, difficulty focusing, and one case of incompatibility. Overall, it is seen as a budget-friendly option for amateur photographers willing to work manually.

Pros
  • Budget-friendly for astrophotography
  • Lightweight and portable design
  • Good build quality
  • Versatile 420-800mm range
  • Effective for moon and stars
Cons
  • Color accuracy issues at long distances
  • Difficult to focus manually
  • Heavy for some users
  • Incompatibility with some cameras
  • Requires tripod and remote shutter
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Build quality 3
🤔 Manual focus 5
🤔 Weight 3
👎 Color accuracy 1
👎 Compatibility 1

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

88 out of 100 medium confidence 20 reviews

The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens is highly praised for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design, making it a versatile and affordable alternative to Sony's GM lenses. Users appreciate its performance in portraits and low light, though some note the plastic build and lack of weather sealing as drawbacks. Overall, it is considered an excellent value for both enthusiasts and professionals.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight design
  • Versatile focal range
  • Good value for money
Cons
  • Plastic build quality
  • No weather sealing
  • Zoom ring reversed from focus ring
  • Slightly long for discrete use
  • Colors slightly duller than GM lenses
👍 Image quality 12
👍 Autofocus performance 10
🤔 Build quality 8
👍 Value for money 7
👍 Weight and portability 6
👍 Low light performance 5

Scores

Video Cinema
Desiontal
35
Tamron
97
Budget
Desiontal
45
Tamron
97
Professional
Desiontal
30
Tamron
94
Portrait
Desiontal
37
Tamron
92
Macro
Desiontal
40
Tamron
88
Street
Desiontal
31
Tamron
84
Landscape
Desiontal
37
Tamron
81
Wildlife Sports
Desiontal
31
Tamron
79
Travel
Desiontal
34
Tamron
74

Specifications

Desiontal 420-800mmTamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min420 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max800 mm75 mm
Elements—17
Groups—15
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—2★
CoatingUltra Multi CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperture8.3-16f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.80 kg0.54 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyVXD linear motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance800 mm180 mm★
Max Magnification—1:2.7★

Pros & Cons

Desiontal 420-800mm

  • Strong stabilization (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong versatility (70th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (67th percentile)
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average build (23rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Desiontal 420-800mm is £770 cheaper (18.7x less).

Desiontal 420-800mm0.845score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G20.121score per dollar

Desiontal 420-800mm offers 7.0x better value for money

Desiontal 420-800mm

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Verdict

★ Winner: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Scores 99 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider