Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Fujifilm
76 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
No customer feedback yet
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
92 out of 100 high confidence 30 reviews
The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR lens is widely praised for its compact size, lightweight build, and excellent image quality. Users highlight its fast and silent autofocus, weather sealing, and versatility for street, portrait, and travel photography. While some note it is not a macro lens and lacks the extreme bokeh of the f/1.4 version, most agree it offers outstanding value as a standard prime.
Pros
- Compact and lightweight design
- Fast and silent autofocus
- Excellent image sharpness
- Weather sealing
- Versatile for street, portrait, and travel
Cons
- Not a macro lens
- Less bokeh than f/1.4 version
- No zoom capability
- Tapered design may look odd
Image quality 10
Build quality 8
Autofocus performance 6
Portability 9
Value for money 5
Weather sealing 4
Scores
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Portrait
Macro
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 19 | 9 |
| Groups | 15 | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 2 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| Coating | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings | Nano-GI coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | 4-6.3 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.57 kg | 0.17 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | stepping motor | stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 350 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.28x | 1:7★ |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.064score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm0.216score per dollar
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm offers 3.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.
