Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Nikon
90 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM 28mm

Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM 28mm

Canon
50 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Nikon
98
Canon
47
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
94
Canon
49
Travel
Nikon
92
Canon
39
Landscape
Nikon
88
Canon
46
Professional
Nikon
83
Canon
46
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
50
Street
Nikon
81
Canon
45
Portrait
Nikon
78
Canon
28
Macro
Nikon
71
Canon
58

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VRCanon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM 28mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min24 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm28 mm
Elements19—
Groups15—
Aspherical Elements2★1
ED Elements1★—
CoatingARNEO and Nano Crystal CoatingsSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/28
Min Aperture4-6.3f/1.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.57 kg0.41 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorUSM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm305 mm★
Max Magnification0.28x★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile

Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM 28mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (71st percentile)
  • Strong macro (69th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average aperture (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM 28mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider