Viltrox AF 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

Viltrox AF 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

Viltrox
63 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
85 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Viltrox
64
Canon
97
Portrait
Viltrox
49
Canon
89
Video Cinema
Viltrox
52
Canon
89
Street
Viltrox
70
Canon
80
Travel
Viltrox
63
Canon
76
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
60
Canon
72
Landscape
Viltrox
61
Canon
72
Macro
Viltrox
65
Canon
71
Professional
Viltrox
59
Canon
70

Specifications

Viltrox AF 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min40 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm135 mm
Elements1016
Groups612
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements11
Coatinghigh-definition nano multi-layer coating, front lens waterproof and anti-fouling coatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.53.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony ECanon EF-S
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.17 kg★0.52 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMSTM
Stabilization✗✓★
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance340 mm★390 mm
Max Magnification1:7.14★0.28x

Pros & Cons

Viltrox AF 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (68th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports