Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma
96 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8 28mm

Nikon
66 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

95 out of 100 high confidence 36 reviews

The Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC DN Art lens is overwhelmingly praised for its exceptional image quality, fast constant aperture, and compact internal zoom design. Users highlight its sharpness, lightweight build, and excellent autofocus performance, especially on crop-sensor mirrorless cameras like the Canon R7 and Fujifilm bodies. A few questions about compatibility with specific cameras and features like weather sealing and aperture ring are noted, but the overall sentiment is extremely positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional image quality
  • Fast constant f/1.8 aperture
  • Compact internal zoom design
  • Lightweight build
  • Sharp and bright photos
Cons
  • No weather sealing mentioned
  • No manual aperture ring on some mounts
  • Compatibility questions with full-frame cameras
  • Expensive for some buyers
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Aperture 7
👍 Build quality 6
👍 Autofocus 4
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Compatibility 12

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8 28mm

78 out of 100 high confidence 54 reviews

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8 lens is widely praised for its excellent value, sharpness, and fast f/2.8 aperture, making it a popular choice for portraits, events, and general photography. Many users find it a great budget alternative to the more expensive 24-70mm f/2.8 S, noting only minor differences in image quality. However, some reviewers report issues with autofocus reliability, softness at wide apertures, and noticeable vignetting, which can be a concern for professional work. Overall, it is seen as a solid, affordable lens for enthusiasts and those new to the Z system.

Pros
  • Excellent value for money
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast f/2.8 aperture
  • Lightweight and balanced
  • Great for portraits and events
Cons
  • Autofocus reliability issues
  • Softness at wide apertures
  • Noticeable vignetting
  • Not as sharp as S-line lenses
  • Build quality feels cheaper
👍 Value for money 12
🤔 Image sharpness 10
🤔 Autofocus performance 8
🤔 Build quality 7
👎 Vignetting 5
👍 Bokeh 4

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
93
Nikon
49
Video Cinema
Sigma
89
Nikon
59
Professional
Sigma
89
Nikon
68
Budget
Sigma
87
Nikon
68
Macro
Sigma
82
Nikon
74
Travel
Sigma
81
Nikon
66
Street
Sigma
79
Nikon
57
Landscape
Sigma
79
Nikon
72
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
68
Nikon
61

Specifications

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DCNikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8 28mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm75 mm
Elements1715
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements4★3
ED Elements4★2
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coatingantifouling coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.8f/22
Min Aperturef/1.8f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades11★9
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.54 kg★0.56 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLA (High-response Linear Actuator)Stepping Motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:4.81:2.94

Pros & Cons

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f/2.8 28mm

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (25th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (34th percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Scores 96 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports