Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
43 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM 100mm
Canon
62 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Portrait
Video Cinema
Macro
Street
Professional
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM 100mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 100 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 400 mm |
| Elements | — | 12 |
| Groups | — | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | Super Spectra Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/45 |
| Min Aperture | — | 5.6-8 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon RF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | — | 0.64 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Nano USM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 881 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.41x★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (32nd percentile)
Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM 100mm
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average aperture (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average bokeh (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Verdict
Winner: Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM 100mm
Scores 62 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.