Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm

BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm

BLAZAR LENS
56 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
BLAZAR LENS
50
Portrait
Nikon
89
BLAZAR LENS
71
Street
Nikon
86
BLAZAR LENS
71
Budget
Nikon
86
BLAZAR LENS
61
Macro
Nikon
85
BLAZAR LENS
24
Landscape
Nikon
83
BLAZAR LENS
39
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
BLAZAR LENS
59
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
BLAZAR LENS
50
Travel
Nikon
75
BLAZAR LENS
59

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm33 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm85 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8T2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades916
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.11 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong versatility (78th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

BLAZAR LENS Remus-M 1.5x FF Anamorphic 33 85mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider