Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC IF Aspherical Zoom 18-125mm

Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC IF Aspherical Zoom 18-125mm

Sigma
62 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
51
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
64
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
57
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
58
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
67
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
48
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
54
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
52
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
53

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC IF Aspherical Zoom 18-125mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm125 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.39 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm125 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC IF Aspherical Zoom 18-125mm

  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC IF Aspherical Zoom 18-125mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider