Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm

Canon
24 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
27
Budget
Nikon
85
Canon
34
Street
Nikon
84
Canon
31
Macro
Nikon
84
Canon
8
Portrait
Nikon
84
Canon
42
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
33
Landscape
Nikon
79
Canon
18
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Canon
25
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
22

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto-zoom
Focal Length Min17 mm75 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements3★—
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.8f/5.6
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★2.27 kg
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 75-300mm

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports