Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm

Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm

Fujifilm
48 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Fujifilm
41
Nikon
89
Budget
Fujifilm
50
Nikon
85
Street
Fujifilm
53
Nikon
84
Macro
Fujifilm
67
Nikon
84
Portrait
Fujifilm
36
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
39
Nikon
82
Landscape
Fujifilm
42
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
39
Nikon
73
Travel
Fujifilm
53
Nikon
70

Specifications

Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min60 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max60 mm28 mm
Elements1013
Groups811
Aspherical Elements13★
ED Elements13★
CoatingSuper EBCMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.4f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.21 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread39 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusStepping Motor★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance267 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:21:5.26

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm

  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong macro (76th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (75th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro 60mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider