Altura Photo QZ0016

Altura Photo QZ0016

Altura Photo
67 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Altura Photo
54
Nikon
89
Budget
Altura Photo
57
Nikon
85
Macro
Altura Photo
85
Nikon
84
Street
Altura Photo
63
Nikon
84
Portrait
Altura Photo
61
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Altura Photo
59
Nikon
82
Landscape
Altura Photo
47
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Altura Photo
56
Nikon
73
Travel
Altura Photo
42
Nikon
70

Specifications

Altura Photo QZ0016Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min—17 mm
Focal Length Max—28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
Coatingmulticoated glass opticsMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/2.8
Min Aperture—f/2.8
Constant—✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountScrew-on lens fits camera lenses with a 52mm front filter threadNikon Z
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.32 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Stepping Motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance52 mm★190 mm
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Altura Photo QZ0016

  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong build (73rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports