Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm

Retropia
45 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm

Nikon
84 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm

45 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews

This lens is a fun, low-cost toy for creating vintage-looking photos, but it has serious quality and compatibility issues. Many users praise its unique color effects and lightweight build, but a significant number report it simply doesn't work or fails to meet advertised expectations. The lack of autofocus, problematic purple vignetting, and missing parts for the Oreo-style design are common complaints. It's best suited for casual experimentation with realistic expectations.

Pros
  • Unique vintage color effects
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Fun for casual photography
  • Low price point
  • Good build quality for toy lens
Cons
  • Incompatibility with some camera modes
  • Purple vignetting can be overwhelming
  • Missing advertised parts (Oreo design)
  • No autofocus or manual focus
  • Some units non-functional (completely opaque)
🤔 Image quality 7
🤔 Build quality 4
🤔 Value for money 5
👎 Compatibility 3
👎 Vignetting 2
👎 Advertising accuracy 4

Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm

82 out of 100 medium confidence 15 reviews

The Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6 VR refurbished lens is generally well-received, with many users praising its value, quiet autofocus, and effective vibration reduction. While some note it is not the sharpest lens and has minor build concerns, most find it a great budget-friendly option for casual use, especially for sports and concerts. A few users mention autofocus can be iffy at max zoom, but overall satisfaction is high.

Pros
  • Great value for money
  • Quiet autofocus
  • Effective vibration reduction
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Sharp image quality
Cons
  • Not the sharpest lens
  • Autofocus iffy at max zoom
  • Plastic build feels cheap
  • Missing inner seal on refurb
  • Higher f-stop compromises low light
👍 Value for money 8
🤔 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Image quality 6
🤔 Build quality 4
👍 Vibration reduction 3
👍 Refurbished condition 5

Scores

Budget
Retropia
49
Nikon
84
Macro
Retropia
38
Nikon
81
Portrait
Retropia
45
Nikon
73
Street
Retropia
48
Nikon
70
Video Cinema
Retropia
49
Nikon
69
Travel
Retropia
47
Nikon
68
Landscape
Retropia
35
Nikon
65
Professional
Retropia
42
Nikon
62
Wildlife Sports
Retropia
35
Nikon
61

Specifications

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mmNikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm
Optics
Typeprimetelephoto
Focal Length Min32 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max32 mm200 mm
Elements—13
Groups—9
ED Elements—2★
Coating—Super Integrated Coating (SIC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/11f/4
Min Aperturef/114-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountCanon RFNikon F
Formatmicro-four-thirdsAPS-C★
Weight0.05 kg★0.34 kg
Filter Thread—52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlySilent Wave Motor
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops—4 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.50 m200 mm★
Max Magnification—1:3.5★

Pros & Cons

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average optical (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Pricing

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm is £174 cheaper (4.5x less).

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm0.894score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm0.373score per dollar

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm offers 2.4x better value for money

Retropia M43 Mount Compatible 32mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm

Scores 84 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2166 55-200mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider