Retropia Canon RF-Mount Compatible 32mm
Retropia
52 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
86 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Macro
Specifications
| Retropia Canon RF-Mount Compatible 32mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 32 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 32 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | — | 19 |
| Groups | — | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/11 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/11 | 4-6.3 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.57 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.50 m | 500 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.28x★ |
Pros & Cons
Retropia Canon RF-Mount Compatible 32mm
- Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average optical (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
Pricing
Retropia Canon RF-Mount Compatible 32mm1.042score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.069score per dollar
Retropia Canon RF-Mount Compatible 32mm offers 15.1x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 86 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
