Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm

Fujifilm
72 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm

88 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2.8 lens is praised for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and weather sealing, making it a versatile workhorse for various photography needs. While many users appreciate its build quality and optical performance, the notable weight and lack of image stabilization are common drawbacks, especially for travel or handheld use. Overall, it is considered a fantastic all-around lens despite these trade-offs.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Weather-sealed construction
  • Excellent image stabilization
  • Versatile zoom range
Cons
  • Heavy weight
  • No image stabilization
  • High price
  • No lens hood included
  • Incorrect filter size image in product listing
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👍 Build quality 5
🤔 Image stabilization 3
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Fujifilm
67
Budget
Sony
91
Fujifilm
76
Street
Sony
88
Fujifilm
60
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Fujifilm
81
Wildlife Sports
Sony
83
Fujifilm
81
Portrait
Sony
82
Fujifilm
50
Landscape
Sony
79
Fujifilm
77
Professional
Sony
76
Fujifilm
74
Macro
Sony
66
Fujifilm
58

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSFujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm140 mm
Elements923
Groups816
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements16★
Coating—Nano-GI (Gradient Index) coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★0.99 kg
Filter Thread41 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusTriple Linear Motor★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★1.00 m
Max Magnification0.215x★0.12x

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm

  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (28th percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is £1,312 cheaper (10.6x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.652score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm0.050score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 13.0x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider