Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF-S7.8mm F4 STM Dual 7mm

Canon RF-S7.8mm F4 STM Dual 7mm

Canon
53 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Canon
45
Budget
Sony
91
Canon
46
Street
Sony
90
Canon
61
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Canon
58
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Canon
47
Landscape
Sony
79
Canon
40
Portrait
Sony
78
Canon
42
Professional
Sony
77
Canon
53
Macro
Sony
69
Canon
67

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSCanon RF-S7.8mm F4 STM Dual 7mm
Optics
Typezoomfisheye
Focal Length Min16 mm8 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm8 mm
Elements99
Groups87
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements12★
Coating—Super Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/4
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.11 kg★0.13 kg
Filter Thread41 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm150 mm★
Max Magnification0.215x1:14★

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Canon RF-S7.8mm F4 STM Dual 7mm

  • Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong macro (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is £207 cheaper (2.5x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.659score per dollar
vs
Canon RF-S7.8mm F4 STM Dual 7mm0.155score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 4.3x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Canon RF-S7.8mm F4 STM Dual 7mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider