Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
88 Overall Score
vs
Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II 85mm

Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II 85mm

Meike
46 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II 85mm

72 out of 100 high confidence 39 reviews

The Meike 85mm f/1.8 lens receives mixed feedback. Many users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and value for the price, especially for portrait and low-light photography. However, a significant number of reviewers report issues with autofocus noise, inconsistent autofocus performance, and even complete focus motor failure. Build quality concerns, such as a loose focus ring, are also mentioned, leading to a polarized sentiment where the lens is either loved for its image quality or criticized for reliability.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Great bokeh
  • Excellent value for money
  • Good for low-light photography
  • Lightweight and compact
Cons
  • Loud autofocus noise
  • Inconsistent autofocus performance
  • Focus motor failure reported
  • Loose focus ring on some units
  • Compatibility issues with some adapters
👍 Image quality 12
👎 Autofocus noise 6
🤔 Autofocus performance 8
👎 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 7
👍 Low light performance 4

Scores

Budget
Nikon
87
Meike
48
Portrait
Nikon
77
Meike
56
Macro
Nikon
73
Meike
44
Street
Nikon
72
Meike
56
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Meike
62
Travel
Nikon
68
Meike
47
Landscape
Nikon
65
Meike
48
Professional
Nikon
62
Meike
63
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Meike
60

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmMeike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II 85mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm85 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm85 mm
Elements—11
Groups—7
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements2★—
CoatingSuper Integrated Coatingmulti-coated on both sides, fingerprint- and oil-resistant coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades711★
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.48 kg0.40 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm★650 mm
Max Magnification—0.17X★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II 85mm

  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Meike 85mm F1.8 SE Mark II 85mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeVideo Cinema

Also Consider