Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

Canon
76 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

82 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, color reproduction, and value for money, especially on a budget. Users praise its compact size, metal mount, and low-light performance, though some note the autofocus is noisy and slow compared to USM lenses. A few isolated complaints mention build quality feeling plasticky or the lens not working at all, but the majority find it a reliable workhorse for both crop sensor and full-frame cameras.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness and color
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Metal mount for durability
  • Great low-light performance
  • Good value for budget buyers
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus
  • Slow autofocus compared to USM
  • Plasticky build quality
  • Lacks image stabilization
  • Large manual focus ring angle
👍 Sharpness 5
🤔 Build quality 4
👎 Autofocus noise 4
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Low light performance 3
👍 Compatibility 2

Scores

Macro
Nikon
73
Canon
95
Budget
Nikon
87
Canon
66
Street
Nikon
73
Canon
82
Portrait
Nikon
81
Canon
75
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Canon
78
Professional
Nikon
63
Canon
74
Travel
Nikon
69
Canon
60
Landscape
Nikon
65
Canon
55
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Canon
64

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmCanon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm28 mm
Elements—11
Groups—8
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements2★1
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingCanon Super Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades7★5
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF-M
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weight0.48 kg0.12 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm94 mm★
Max Magnification—1.2x★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

BudgetTravelPortraitLandscape

Canon RF EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM 28mm Better at:

MacroStreetProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider