Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Canon
64 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

78 out of 100 high confidence 459 reviews

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM lens is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, fast and silent autofocus, and robust build quality. Many users consider it a workhorse for sports, portraits, and low-light photography, though the lack of image stabilization is a notable drawback for some. A significant number of reviews highlight the lens's weight and the potential for focus inconsistencies, particularly with moving subjects. Concerns about Canon's support for older models and the tripod collar design also appear in negative feedback.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness and image quality
  • Fast and silent autofocus (USM)
  • Excellent for low-light photography
  • Versatile for sports and portraits
  • Robust build quality
Cons
  • No image stabilization
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Tripod collar design issues
  • Inconsistent autofocus with moving subjects
  • Canon no longer supports repairs
👍 Image quality 35
🤔 Autofocus performance 28
👍 Build quality 22
👎 Weight and size 18
👎 Image stabilization 15
👍 Value for money 12

Scores

Landscape
Nikon
68
Canon
87
Budget
Nikon
84
Canon
71
Portrait
Nikon
81
Canon
49
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Canon
76
Street
Nikon
74
Canon
56
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Canon
74
Macro
Nikon
73
Canon
59
Travel
Nikon
71
Canon
69
Professional
Nikon
64
Canon
69

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmCanon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm200 mm
Elements—17
Groups—13
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements25★
CoatingSuper Integrated CoatingAir Sphere Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/32
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.48 kg★1.07 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SUSM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm★700 mm
Max Magnification—0.3x★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

  • Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm is £1,091 cheaper (3.7x less).

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.219score per dollar
vs
Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM0.043score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm offers 5.1x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortrait

Canon L RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Better at:

LandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider