Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
88 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Viltrox
67 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 23 reviews

The Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 is widely praised for its exceptional sharpness, lightweight design, and outstanding value for money. Users consistently highlight its impressive image quality, with sharp details and pleasing bokeh, often comparing it favorably to much more expensive lenses. While the autofocus is generally reliable for portraits and stills, some users note it can be noisy and not as fast as native Fuji lenses. A few isolated concerns about dust ingress and the plastic build have been mentioned, but overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Excellent value for money
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Good low-light performance
Cons
  • Noisy autofocus (some users)
  • Autofocus slower than native lenses
  • Plastic build
  • Dust ingress reported
  • No physical aperture ring
👍 Image quality 18
👍 Value for money 15
🤔 Build quality 12
🤔 Autofocus performance 11
👍 Size and weight 10
👍 Bokeh 7

Scores

Budget
Nikon
83
Viltrox
62
Portrait
Nikon
79
Viltrox
63
Macro
Nikon
73
Viltrox
59
Street
Nikon
72
Viltrox
72
Video Cinema
Nikon
71
Viltrox
62
Travel
Nikon
68
Viltrox
55
Landscape
Nikon
65
Viltrox
55
Professional
Nikon
62
Viltrox
54
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
61
Viltrox
54

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mmViltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm56 mm
Focal Length Max85 mm56 mm
Elements—11
Groups—9
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements24★
CoatingSuper Integrated Coatinghigh-definition nano-multilayer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/16
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/1.7
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountNikon FSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.48 kg0.17 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF-SSTM★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance380 mm★550 mm
Max Magnification—1:9.09★

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm is £233 cheaper (2.3x less).

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.215score per dollar
vs
Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm0.385score per dollar

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm offers 1.8x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Viltrox AF 56/1.7 XF 56mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider