Nikon 20100

Nikon 20100

Nikon
70 Overall Score
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Nikon 20100

88 out of 100 high confidence 145 reviews

The NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S Macro Lens is overwhelmingly praised for its exceptional sharpness, beautiful bokeh, and versatility as both a macro and portrait lens. Users highlight its lightweight build, effective VR, and compatibility with Z-series cameras, though some note that autofocus can be slow, especially for macro work, and a few mention focus shifting issues or a plastic feel. Overall, it is considered a top-tier lens that delivers stunning image quality.

Pros
  • Exceptional sharpness
  • Beautiful bokeh
  • Versatile macro and portrait use
  • Lightweight build
  • Effective vibration reduction
Cons
  • Slow autofocus in macro mode
  • Autofocus hunting in some conditions
  • Plastic feel for some users
  • Focus shifting issues reported
  • Bulky with hood attached
👍 Image quality 45
🤔 Autofocus performance 25
👍 Build quality 20
👍 Versatility 30
👍 Value for money 15
👍 Weight and size 18

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

85 out of 100 medium confidence 22 reviews

The Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM lens is a notable upgrade from the kit 18-55mm, offering a constant fast aperture, silent autofocus, and superior image quality. Users praise its sharpness, bokeh, and build, though they note it is heavier and bulkier. A few refurbished units had minor scratches or early malfunction, but overall the lens is highly recommended for Sony Alpha APS-C cameras.

Pros
  • Constant F2.8 aperture
  • Fast and silent autofocus
  • Excellent image sharpness and contrast
  • Pleasing bokeh
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Some units have early malfunctions
  • Not compatible with full-frame cameras
  • Moderate flare issue
  • Limited zoom range to 50mm
👍 Image quality 9
👍 Build quality 8
👍 Autofocus performance 5
👎 Weight and size 6
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Refurbished condition 6

Scores

Travel
Nikon
54
Sony
94
Budget
Nikon
61
Sony
90
Street
Nikon
50
Sony
88
Video Cinema
Nikon
68
Sony
85
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
62
Sony
83
Portrait
Nikon
38
Sony
82
Macro
Nikon
82
Sony
66
Landscape
Nikon
63
Sony
79
Professional
Nikon
64
Sony
76

Specifications

Nikon 20100Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min105 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max105 mm50 mm
Elements169
Groups118
Aspherical Elements14★
ED Elements11
CoatingNano Crystal and ARNEO Coatings—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades9★7
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.63 kg0.11 kg★
Filter Thread62 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Autofocus
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops★4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance290 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification1:1★0.215x

Pros & Cons

Nikon 20100

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Pricing

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is £745 cheaper (6.5x less).

Nikon 201000.079score per dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.651score per dollar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 8.2x better value for money

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Nikon 20100 Better at:

Macro

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider