Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon
61 Overall Score
vs
Sigma DG 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DG IF Macro Aspherical

Sigma DG 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DG IF Macro Aspherical

Sigma
60 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Canon
76
Sigma
53
Landscape
Canon
74
Sigma
54
Portrait
Canon
45
Sigma
73
Budget
Canon
66
Sigma
61
Macro
Canon
51
Sigma
66
Professional
Canon
65
Sigma
56
Street
Canon
59
Sigma
64
Wildlife Sports
Canon
62
Sigma
48
Video Cinema
Canon
57
Sigma
55

Specifications

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USMSigma DG 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DG IF Macro Aspherical
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm300 mm
Elements1214
Groups910
Aspherical Elements34★
ED Elements12★
CoatingSuper Spectra coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/43.5-6.3
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountCanon EFCanon SLR
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.50 kg0.49 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification0.24x1:3★

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

  • Strong af (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (76th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Sigma DG 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DG IF Macro Aspherical

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Verdict

═ Tie

Both products are closely matched - Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM wins 5 specs while Sigma DG 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DG IF Macro Aspherical wins 4.

Canon L EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Better at:

BudgetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma DG 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DG IF Macro Aspherical Better at:

MacroStreetPortrait