Fujifilm XF 16537744 18-135mm

Fujifilm XF 16537744 18-135mm

Fujifilm
72 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Nikon
89 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Fujifilm XF 16537744 18-135mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews

The Fujinon XF 18-135mm lens is widely praised for its versatile focal range, sharp image quality, and lightweight design, making it an ideal everyday carry for travel and outdoor photography. Users appreciate the weather resistance and close focusing capabilities, though some note the zoom ring can be stiff and the lens is slightly heavy on smaller camera bodies. A few concerns about zoom smoothness and high-pitched noise are attributed to the weather sealing and complex internal mechanics, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Versatile focal range (18-135mm)
  • Sharp image quality
  • Lightweight design
  • Weather resistance
  • Close focusing capability
Cons
  • Stiff zoom ring
  • Slightly heavy on small bodies
  • No aperture ring
  • Zoom smoothness concerns
  • High-pitched noise when zooming
👍 Image quality 6
👍 Build quality 4
🤔 Zoom mechanism 5
🤔 Weight and size 5
👍 Weather sealing 4
👍 Value for money 3

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews

The Nikon 16-85mm VR is widely praised as an excellent all-around zoom for DX cameras, delivering sharp images across the focal range with effective VR. Users note it outperforms kit lenses like the 18-105mm and even rivals the pricier 17-55mm in sharpness, though it is heavy and somewhat slow (f/3.5-5.6). Build quality is solid with a metal barrel, and the 16mm wide end is a key advantage for landscapes. Some caution about vignetting with thick filters and barrel distortion at 16mm, but overall it is considered a worthy investment for enthusiasts.

Pros
  • Excellent sharpness across focal range
  • Effective VR II image stabilization
  • Solid build with metal barrel
  • Useful 16-85mm zoom range
  • Great for landscapes and travel
Cons
  • Heavy weight (3.1 lb with D90)
  • Slow aperture (f/3.5-5.6)
  • Expensive for an f/3.5-5.6 lens
  • Barrel distortion at 16mm
  • Vignetting with thick filters at 16mm
👍 Image quality 7
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Vibration reduction 5
👎 Weight 4
🤔 Value for money 4
👍 Focal range 4

Scores

Landscape
Fujifilm
85
Nikon
68
Budget
Fujifilm
72
Nikon
84
Travel
Fujifilm
83
Nikon
71
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
81
Nikon
64
Portrait
Fujifilm
49
Nikon
80
Street
Fujifilm
69
Nikon
77
Professional
Fujifilm
73
Nikon
67
Macro
Fujifilm
62
Nikon
73
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
64
Nikon
70

Specifications

Fujifilm XF 16537744 18-135mmNikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min18 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm85 mm
Elements16—
Groups12—
Aspherical Elements4★3
ED Elements22
CoatingHT-EBC Multi-LayerSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.63.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountFujifilm XNikon F
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.49 kg0.48 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motor★AF-S
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops5 stops★4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm380 mm★
Max Magnification0.27x★—

Pros & Cons

Fujifilm XF 16537744 18-135mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (22nd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm is £331 cheaper (1.8x less).

Fujifilm XF 16537744 18-135mm0.098score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm0.218score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm offers 2.2x better value for money

Fujifilm XF 16537744 18-135mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.

Fujifilm XF 16537744 18-135mm Better at:

TravelLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports

Nikon NIKKOR 2178 16-85mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetPortraitVideo Cinema

Also Consider