Sigma 883101 18-250mm

Sigma 883101 18-250mm

Sigma
73 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
86 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Sigma
74
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Sigma
64
Canon
82
Budget
Sigma
79
Canon
79
Landscape
Sigma
56
Canon
79
Travel
Sigma
63
Canon
78
Professional
Sigma
55
Canon
77
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
56
Canon
75
Portrait
Sigma
68
Canon
49
Street
Sigma
66
Canon
66

Specifications

Sigma 883101 18-250mmCanon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min18 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max250 mm70 mm
Elements—15
Groups—12
Aspherical Elements—2★
ED Elements—2★
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-6.3f/2.8
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountCanon EF-SCanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.47 kg★0.49 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeMicromotor-type AF motorSTM★
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops5.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm239 mm★
Max Magnification1:2.91:4.2

Pros & Cons

Sigma 883101 18-250mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 86 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Sigma 883101 18-250mm Better at:

Portrait

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Better at:

MacroTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports