FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

FotoZ
72 Overall Score
vs
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm

Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm

Vivitar
35 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
FotoZ
89
Vivitar
20
Street
FotoZ
71
Vivitar
46
Budget
FotoZ
68
Vivitar
34
Travel
FotoZ
65
Vivitar
33
Portrait
FotoZ
61
Vivitar
46
Video Cinema
FotoZ
60
Vivitar
33
Landscape
FotoZ
59
Vivitar
22
Professional
FotoZ
55
Vivitar
30
Wildlife Sports
FotoZ
55
Vivitar
25

Specifications

FotoZ KZ-03 24mmVivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
Optics
Typewide-anglemacro
Focal Length Min16 mm55 mm
Focal Length Max24 mm55 mm
Coatingnano-coatings—
Build
MountSony E55mm
Weight0.12 kg★0.14 kg
Filter Thread41 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—manual focus only
Stabilization✓★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance16 mm★—
Max Magnification10X★—

Pros & Cons

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

  • Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (68th percentile)

Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm

  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Pricing

Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm is £19 cheaper (1.8x less).

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm1.646score per dollar
vs
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm1.429score per dollar

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm offers 1.2x better value for money

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm

Verdict

★ Winner: FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

Scores 72 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 11 specs.

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider