Audio-Technica M Series ATH-M60x
Audio-Technica
47 Overall Score
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Beyerdynamic
89 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Audio-Technica M Series ATH-M60x
78 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews
The Audio-Technica ATH-M60X headphones receive mixed feedback. While many users praise their exceptional sound quality, comfort, and durability over years of use, some report discomfort and swelling. The sound signature is described as more enjoyable than the M50X, with strong separation and clarity, but the lack of official replacement pads is a notable drawback.
Pros
- Exceptional sound quality
- Comfortable on-ear design
- Durable build lasting years
- Great value for money
- Strong sound separation and clarity
Cons
- Causes head pain and ear swelling
- No official replacement pads available
- On-ear design may take getting used to
Sound quality 3
Comfort 3
Durability 1
Value for money 1
Replacement parts 1
Design 2
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Specifications
| Audio-Technica M Series ATH-M60x | Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.22 kg | 0.22 kg |
| Ear Cushion | memory foam | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | memory foam | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 45 mm | 45 mm |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 15 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 28 kHz★ | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Audio-Technica M Series Remastered ATH-M60x Closed-Back On-Ear Dynamic Monitor Headphones with Detachable Cables, Black | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 3 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Audio-Technica M Series ATH-M60x
- Strong sound (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong build (75th percentile)
- Strong comfort (67th percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
- Below average social proof (33rd percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Pricing
Audio-Technica M Series ATH-M60x0.278score per dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1000.528score per dollar
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 41 specs.
