Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB GDDR6 workstation
Lenovo
27 Overall Score
vs
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6
ASRock
56 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB GDDR6 workstation
No customer feedback yet
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6
82 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews
The ASRock RX 7600 Challenger 8GB is well-received for its solid 1080p performance, good thermals, and easy RGB software. Users appreciate its value for budget builds, though some note the 8GB VRAM and ray tracing are limiting for higher resolutions. A few mention driver instability and lack of support from ASRock.
Pros
- Solid 1080p performance
- Good thermals under load
- Easy RGB software
- Good value for budget builds
- Energy efficient
Cons
- 8GB VRAM limiting at 1440p
- Mediocre ray tracing performance
- Driver instability after updates
- Lack of ASRock support
Performance 1080p 6
Value for money 5
Thermals 4
Build quality 3
Rgb software 3
Vram limitation 3
Scores
Budget
Gaming 1080p
Content Creation
Ray Tracing
Gaming 1440p
Workstation
Gaming 4k
Ai Llm
Specifications
| Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 | ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Quadro NVS 510 | Radeon RX 7600 |
| Brand | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3 |
| Class | workstation | consumer |
| Process | 5★ | 6 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 2 GB | 8 GB★ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| Compute | ||
| Stream Processors | No data | |
| Tensor Cores | — | 64★ |
| RT Cores | 54★ | 32 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 55.29999923706055★ | 43.5 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 27.649999618530273★ | 21.75 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 35★ | 165 |
| Recommended PSU | 450★ | 550 |
| Power Connectors | — | 8-Pin |
| Cooler | Fan | Dual Fan★ |
| Fans | — | 2★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | — | PCI Express 4.0 x8 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 3★ |
| HDMI | — | 1★ |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
| Max Resolution | — | 7680 x 4320 |
| Physical | ||
| Length | — | 269★ |
| Slot Width | — | 2★ |
| Form Factor | Low Profile | ATX |
| Weight | 0.10 kg★ | 0.91 kg |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✗ | ✓★ |
| AV1 Encode | — | ✓★ |
| DirectX | — | 12 Ultimate |
| RGB | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB GDDR6 workstation
- Strong compute (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Below average raster (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average feature (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average efficiency (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average vram (16th percentile)16th %ile
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR6
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong connectivity (71st percentile)
Pricing
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB GDDR6 workstation0.363score per dollar
vs
ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger 8GB GDDR60.141score per dollar
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB GDDR6 workstation offers 2.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: ASRock Radeon RX 7600 Challenger
Scores 56 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 16 of 36 specs.
