Intel CD8069504449200

Intel CD8069504449200

Intel
47 Overall Score
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER
7 Overall Score

Scores

Productivity
Intel
57
MICRO CENTER
6
Server
Intel
50
MICRO CENTER
4
Ai Llm
Intel
42
MICRO CENTER
4
Budget
Intel
32
MICRO CENTER
9
Efficiency
Intel
29
MICRO CENTER
5
Gaming
Intel
25
MICRO CENTER
7

Specifications

Intel CD8069504449200MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Processor
BrandIntel—
SeriesXeon Silver—
Model4215R—
CodenameCascade Lake—
Classserver—
Cores & Clocks
Cores8★—
Threads16★—
Base Clock
3,200
No data
Boost Clock
4,000
No data
Cache
L2 Cache8★—
L3 Cache11★—
Performance
PassMark Multi
14,939
No data
PassMark Single
2,171
No data
Platform & Power
SocketLGA 1156—
TDP130★—

Pros & Cons

Intel CD8069504449200

  • Strong multi thread (71st percentile)
  • Strong ai (69th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

  • Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Intel CD80695044492000.036score per dollar
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.006score per dollar

Intel CD8069504449200 offers 6.0x better value for money

Intel CD8069504449200

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Verdict

★ Winner: Intel CD8069504449200

Scores 47 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 15 specs.

Intel CD8069504449200 Better at:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Also Consider