MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
65 Overall Score
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-core sTR5
AMD
81 Overall Score
Scores
Server
Productivity
Ai Llm
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
Specifications
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | AMD |
| Series | — | Ryzen Threadripper PRO |
| Model | — | 7985WX |
| Codename | — | Storm Peak |
| Class | — | server |
| Process | — | 5★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 64★ |
| Threads | No data | |
| Base Clock | No data | |
| Boost Clock | No data | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 64★ |
| L3 Cache | No data | |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | No data | |
| Channels | — | 8★ |
| Max Memory | No data | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | sTR5 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | No data | |
| TDP | — | 350★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 350★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✓★ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | None |
Pros & Cons
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong efficiency (66th percentile)
- Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-core sTR5
- Strong multi thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong platform (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Below average affordability (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Pricing
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.056score per dollar
vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX 64-core sTR50.009score per dollar
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF offers 6.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Scores 81 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 26 specs.
