Canon EOS R R5 Mark II
Canon
81 Overall Score
vs
Anker T8170
Anker
30 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Canon EOS R R5 Mark II
78 out of 100 high confidence 170 reviews
The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is widely praised for its exceptional autofocus, especially for sports and wildlife, with many users noting a significant upgrade from the original R5. However, several reviewers report overheating issues during extended use, particularly in warm conditions, and some express disappointment with high ISO noise and occasional freezing or autofocus failures. The camera's pre-capture and eye-tracking features are game-changers for action photography, but the need for new LP-E6P batteries to unlock full functionality is a common frustration.
Pros
- Exceptional autofocus speed and accuracy
- Excellent for sports and wildlife photography
- Pre-capture feature for action shots
- Eye-tracking autofocus works well
- Improved viewfinder with no blackout
Cons
- Overheating during extended use
- High ISO noise at higher settings
- Occasional freezing and lockups
- Autofocus failures in some conditions
- Requires new LP-E6P batteries for full functionality
Autofocus performance 35
Overheating issues 12
High iso noise 8
Battery compatibility 10
Pre capture feature 9
Build quality 15
Anker T8170
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Photography
Video
Youtube
Beginner
Product Photography
Vlogging
Streaming
Travel
Specifications
| Canon EOS R R5 Mark II | Anker T8170 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | — |
| Size | full-frame | 1/2.3-inch |
| Megapixels | 45 MP★ | 3 MP |
| ISO Range | 100★ | — |
| Processor | DIGIC X | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | PhotoPhase Detection: 1053VideoPhase Detection: 975 | — |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | — |
| Animal AF | ✓★ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 30 fps★ | — |
| Burst (Electronic) | 20 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/32000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 8K★ | — |
| 4K FPS | 120 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 240 fps★ | — |
| 10-bit | ✓★ | — |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| RAW Video | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | RAW, H.265 | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3.2"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Articulating | ✓★ | — |
| EVF Resolution | 5.8M dots★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.59 kg★ | 0.63 kg |
| Battery Life | 320 shots★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✗ |
| USB | USB-C★ | — |
| HDMI | HDMI Output | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Canon EOS R R5 Mark II
- Strong display (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong video (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Below average social proof (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Anker T8170
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average sensor (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
- Below average display (30th percentile)
- Below average burst (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Canon EOS R R5 Mark II0.027score per dollar
vs
Anker T81700.116score per dollar
Anker T8170 offers 4.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Canon EOS R R5 Mark II
Scores 81 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 23 of 33 specs.
