OM System OM-5 Mark II OM-5 Mark II Sand Beige 2025
OM System
71 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27
Fujifilm
18 Overall Score
Scores
Sports Wildlife
Photography
Wedding Events
Product Photography
Vlogging
Streaming
Beginner
Youtube
Travel
Video
Specifications
| OM System OM-5 Mark II OM-5 Mark II | Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | — |
| Size | micro-four-thirds | — |
| Megapixels | 50 MP★ | — |
| ISO Range | 100★ | — |
| Processor | TruePic X | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | — |
| Animal AF | ✓★ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 12 fps★ | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | — |
| 4K FPS | 60 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 120 fps★ | — |
| 10-bit | ✓★ | — |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | H.264, H.265 | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | — |
| Articulating | ✓★ | — |
| EVF Resolution | 2.4M dots★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.37 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Battery Life | 440 shots★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | ✓★ | — |
| USB | USB-C★ | — |
| HDMI | Micro HDMI★ | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
OM System OM-5 Mark II OM-5 Mark II Sand Beige 2025
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong battery (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Below average build (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average connectivity (21st percentile)
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
Pricing
OM System OM-5 Mark II OM-5 Mark II Sand Beige 2025
Fujifilm QuickSnap Quicksnap 400/27
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: OM System OM-5 Mark II OM-5 Mark II
Scores 71 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 24 of 29 specs.
