aiprotablet SC7731E

aiprotablet SC7731E

aiprotablet
30 Gesamtbewertung
vs
UMIDIGI Active T1

UMIDIGI Active T1

UMIDIGI
68 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Art Design
aiprotablet
21
UMIDIGI
64
Reading
aiprotablet
24
UMIDIGI
61
Business
aiprotablet
22
UMIDIGI
60
Entertainment
aiprotablet
24
UMIDIGI
59
Student
aiprotablet
25
UMIDIGI
59
Productivity
aiprotablet
19
UMIDIGI
57

Spezifikationen

aiprotablet SC7731EUMIDIGI Active T1
Processor
CPU2 GHz2000 MHz
Cores48
GPUMali-G52
Memory & Storage
RAM8 GB16 GB
Storage32 GB128 GB
Storage TypeeMMC
Expandable
Display
Size7"11"
Resolution600 px
PanelIPS
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
BluetoothBluetooth 5.0Bluetooth 5.0
USB-C1
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Fingerprint Reader
Face Unlock
IP RatingIP68 & IP69K
Physical
Weight0.73 kg0.76 kg
OSAndroid 15Android

Vor- & Nachteile

aiprotablet SC7731E

  • Strong social proof (67th percentile)
  • Strong ram (66th percentile)
  • Below average screen (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average storage (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average feature (23rd percentile)
  • Below average battery (31st percentile)

UMIDIGI Active T1

  • Strong user sentiment (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong battery (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong ram (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average screen (29th percentile)

Preise

aiprotablet SC7731E is 106 £ cheaper (3.0x less).

aiprotablet SC7731E0.557Score pro Dollar
vs
UMIDIGI Active T10.426Score pro Dollar

aiprotablet SC7731E bietet 1.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

aiprotablet SC7731E

UMIDIGI Active T1

Fazit

Gewinner: UMIDIGI Active T1

Scores 68 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 20 specs.

UMIDIGI Active T1 Besser bei:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment

Auch in Betracht ziehen