SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

SanDisk
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Solidigm D7-P5620

Solidigm D7-P5620

Solidigm
63 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
SanDisk
86
Solidigm
24
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Solidigm
59
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Solidigm
41
Budget
SanDisk
72
Solidigm
38
Laptop
SanDisk
67
Solidigm
33
Portable
SanDisk
24
Solidigm
16

Spezifikationen

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Solidigm D7-P5620
Drive
Capacity
8,000
1,600
Form FactorM.2 2280U.2
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★4
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
Keine Daten
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
Keine Daten
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Keine Daten
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)55
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Vor- & Nachteile

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile

Solidigm D7-P5620

  • Strong capacity (67th percentile)
  • Strong speed (67th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation