Crucial (CT2K32G4DFD832A)
Crucial
68 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston ValueRAM 4GB DDR4-2400
Kingston
30 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
Spezifikationen
| Crucial | Kingston ValueRAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 260 |
| Rank | 2Rx8 | 1Rx16 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 22 | 17★ |
| Timings | 22-22-22 | — |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158 | 1.2000000476837158 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Crucial (CT2K32G4DFD832A)
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
- Strong feature (65th percentile)
Kingston ValueRAM 4GB DDR4-2400
- Strong affordability (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average capacity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average speed (29th percentile)
- Below average social proof (32nd percentile)
Preise
Crucial (CT2K32G4DFD832A)0.112Score pro Dollar
vs
Kingston ValueRAM 4GB DDR4-24001.014Score pro Dollar
Kingston ValueRAM 4GB DDR4-2400 bietet 9.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Crucial
Scores 68 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
