Crucial (CT2K32G4DFD832A)
Crucial
63 Gesamtbewertung
vs
G.Skill Ripjaws 4GB DDR3L-1600 CL9 SODIMM
G.Skill
31 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
Spezifikationen
| Crucial | G.Skill Ripjaws | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4★ | DDR3L |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | SODIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 204 |
| Rank | 2Rx8 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 22 | 9★ |
| Timings | 22-22-22 | 9-9-9-28 |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158★ | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Crucial (CT2K32G4DFD832A)
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (67th percentile)
- Strong feature (65th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (8th percentile)8th %ile
G.Skill Ripjaws 4GB DDR3L-1600 CL9 SODIMM
- Strong affordability (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong latency (78th percentile)
- Below average capacity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
Preise
Crucial (CT2K32G4DFD832A)0.104Score pro Dollar
vs
G.Skill Ripjaws 4GB DDR3L-1600 CL9 SODIMM0.198Score pro Dollar
G.Skill Ripjaws 4GB DDR3L-1600 CL9 SODIMM bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Crucial
Scores 63 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 16 specs.
