OWC 8GB
OWC
27 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
Crucial
69 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
Spezifikationen
| OWC 8GB | Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | SODIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 260 | 288 |
| Rank | — | 2Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 17★ | 22 |
| Timings | — | 22-22-22 |
| Voltage | 1.2000000476837158 | 1.2000000476837158 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | — | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
OWC 8GB
- Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
- Below average speed (29th percentile)
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
- Strong capacity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
Preise
OWC 8GB0.457Score pro Dollar
vs
Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A0.112Score pro Dollar
OWC 8GB bietet 4.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Crucial CT2K32G4DFD832A
Scores 69 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
