Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
Team Group
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston FURY Beast
Kingston
64 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Spezifikationen
| Team Group | Kingston FURY Beast | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 32★ | 40 |
| Timings | 32-39-39-84 | 40-40-40 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.25★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | Intel XMP 3.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓ | ✓ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average affordability (23rd percentile)
Kingston FURY Beast
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong speed (78th percentile)
- Below average latency (32nd percentile)
Preise
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)0.152Score pro Dollar
vs
Kingston FURY Beast0.223Score pro Dollar
Kingston FURY Beast bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Team Group
Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 4 of 16 specs.
