Team Group (FF3D532G6000HC30DC01)

Team Group (FF3D532G6000HC30DC01)

Team Group
83 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Crucial (CT8G4DFS8266)

Crucial (CT8G4DFS8266)

Crucial
50 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Team Group
89
Crucial
47
Budget
Team Group
85
Crucial
80
Workstation
Team Group
84
Crucial
40
Laptop
Team Group
61
Crucial
37
Server
Team Group
38
Crucial
16

Spezifikationen

Team GroupCrucial
Memory
TypeDDR5★DDR4
Form FactorUDIMMUDIMM
Total Capacity
32,768
8,192
Modules2★1
Per Module
16,384
8,192
Pins288288
Rank1Rx81Rx8
Performance
Speed
6,000
3,200
CAS Latency3016★
Timings30-36-36-7616-18-18-36
Voltage1.3500000238418581.2000000476837158★
Class
ECC✗✗
Registered✗✗
OC ProfileIntel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO—
Features
RGB✓★✗
Heat Spreader✓★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Team Group (FF3D532G6000HC30DC01)

  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong speed (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average affordability (24th percentile)

Crucial (CT8G4DFS8266)

  • Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong affordability (78th percentile)
  • Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average capacity (23rd percentile)

Preise

Crucial (CT8G4DFS8266) is 511 £ cheaper (7.2x less).

Team Group (FF3D532G6000HC30DC01)0.140Score pro Dollar
vs
Crucial (CT8G4DFS8266)0.614Score pro Dollar

Crucial (CT8G4DFS8266) bietet 4.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Team Group (FF3D532G6000HC30DC01)

Crucial (CT8G4DFS8266)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Team Group

Scores 83 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 16 specs.

Team Group Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopServerWorkstation

Auch in Betracht ziehen