ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
ASUS
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kenowa HD-133 13.3" 2023
Kenowa
21 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Spezifikationen
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" | Kenowa HD-133 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 26.5" | 13.3" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 1366 x 768 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | — |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | — |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | — |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 135% sRGB | 72% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| HDR Support | HDR10★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | — |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 2★ | — |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓★ | — |
| Swivel | ✓★ | — |
| Pivot | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | — |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Power | 25W★ | — |
| Weight | 6.70 kg | 1.16 kg★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong color (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong connectivity (95th percentile)95th %ile
Kenowa HD-133 13.3" 2023
- Strong portability (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average display (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average ergonomic (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average performance (23rd percentile)
Preise
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 20240.154Score pro Dollar
vs
Kenowa HD-133 13.3" 20230.323Score pro Dollar
Kenowa HD-133 13.3" 2023 bietet 2.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5" Black 2024
Kenowa HD-133 13.3" 2023
Fazit
Gewinner: ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQDMG 26.5"
Scores 96 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 28 specs.
