Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
86 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Meike 35mm F1.8 AF STM Full Frame Portrait 35mm
Meike
71 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Budget
Landscape
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Street
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | Meike 35mm F1.8 AF STM Full Frame Portrait 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 19 | — |
| Groups | 15 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | — |
| ED Elements | 1★ | — |
| Coating | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/1.8 |
| Min Aperture | 4-6.3 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.57 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | STM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 53 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.28x★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
Meike 35mm F1.8 AF STM Full Frame Portrait 35mm
- Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong aperture (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong bokeh (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong af (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average optical (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Preise
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.061Score pro Dollar
vs
Meike 35mm F1.8 AF STM Full Frame Portrait 35mm0.222Score pro Dollar
Meike 35mm F1.8 AF STM Full Frame Portrait 35mm bietet 3.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
