Sony FE SELP1635G 16-35mm

Sony FE SELP1635G 16-35mm

Sony
76 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Sony
64
Panasonic
95
Landscape
Sony
92
Panasonic
91
Budget
Sony
81
Panasonic
91
Travel
Sony
78
Panasonic
86
Video Cinema
Sony
76
Panasonic
86
Professional
Sony
82
Panasonic
84
Wildlife Sports
Sony
83
Panasonic
82
Street
Sony
70
Panasonic
82
Portrait
Sony
51
Panasonic
81

Spezifikationen

Sony FE SELP1635G 16-35mmPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm200 mm
Elements1317
Groups1213
Aspherical Elements21
ED Elements24
CoatingFluorine CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/4
Min Aperturef/44-7.1
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountSony EL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.35 kg0.41 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeXD Linear MotorsAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4.5 stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance240 mm140 mm
Max Magnification0.19x0.5x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sony FE SELP1635G 16-35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo Cinema